這本雜志提供了理論、經驗和理論上有見地的文章，探討了歐洲的政治，這是全球體系中最區(qū)域化的政治和經濟環(huán)境。比較歐洲政治（CEP）產生于歐洲和北美政治科學家之間獨特的編輯合作關系。該雜志探討了有關現(xiàn)有學科觀點和理論慣例局限性的挑戰(zhàn)性問題。在促進歐洲政治分析各分支學科之間的跨學科和更大的對話的同時，比較歐洲政治出版了該領域最好和最原始的作品。該雜志沒有將自己與特定的方法論或理論觀點結合起來，發(fā)表了大量的文章，探討核心的經驗發(fā)展和理論創(chuàng)新。《華爾街日報》提供了一些工作，這些工作發(fā)展了實質性實證調查和理論闡述之間的聯(lián)系，超越了國內、比較和國際分析之間的人為劃分。編輯們還發(fā)表了有限數(shù)量的辯論文章和評論文章，涉及當代理論和實證爭議問題。

This journal presents theoretical, empirical and theoretically-informed articles that explore politics in Europe, the most regionally integrated political and economic environment in the global system.Comparative European Politics (CEP) arises out of a unique editorial partnership linking political scientists in Europe and North America. The journal explores challenging questions about the limitations of existing disciplinary perspectives and theoretical conventions. While promoting interdisciplinarity and a greater dialogue between the various sub-disciplines of European political analysis, Comparative European Politics publishes the best and most original work in the field.Without aligning itself to particular methodologies or theoretical perspectives, the journal publishes substantial articles which explore core empirical developments and theoretical innovation. The journal offers work which develops links between substantive empirical investigations and theoretical elaboration, and which transcends artificial divisions between domestic, comparative, and international analysis. The editors also publish a limited number of debate pieces and review articles related to issues of contemporary theoretical and empirical controversy.