作為超過10年學(xué)術(shù)討論的一部分，歐洲懷疑主義（尤其是與政黨政治有關(guān)的）迄今還沒有得到足夠的定義。Taggart和Szczerbiak廣泛接受的定義，他們將歐洲懷疑論分為“硬”和“軟”兩種版本，由于整個概念化缺乏歐洲懷疑論（親歐洲態(tài)度）的對應(yīng)物，以及歐盟國家地位（歐盟政治）的定義，因此他們存在一些弱點(diǎn)。因此，幾乎所有對當(dāng)前歐洲一體化形式的批評都被稱為歐洲懷疑論。這種方法廣泛地出現(xiàn)在政治和學(xué)者的論述中，是建立在隱含地將歐盟概念化為一個靜態(tài)和最終的行動者的基礎(chǔ)上的。本文對這種歐洲懷疑論的概念化提出了挑戰(zhàn)，并通過對當(dāng)前“最新技術(shù)”的詳細(xì)分析，提出了一種不同的觀點(diǎn)，即歐洲懷疑論的概念化是先前關(guān)于支持歐洲立場和歐盟政治的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的結(jié)果。

Being a part of academic discussion for more than 10 years, Euroscepticism (especially in connection with party politics) have not been so far adequate defined. Widely accepted definition by Taggart and Szczerbiak who has divided Euroscepticism between its “hard” and “soft” version suffers from several weaknesses as the whole conceptualization lacks counterpart of Euroscepticism (pro European attitude) as well as definition of of the EU statehood (EU polity). Thus, almost every critique against current form of European integration is labelled as a Euroscepticism. This approach, widely present both in the political and scholar discourses, is built upon implicitly present conceptualization of the European Union as a static and finality reached actor. The paper challenges this conceptualization of Euroscepticism and through detailed analysis of current “state of art” offers a different perspective where conceptualization of Euroscepticism is a consequence of previously stated standards concerning pro-European stance and EU polity.