《當代數學分析期刊》(亞美尼亞科學院)是亞美尼亞著名的函數理論學派的研究刊物，今天，該期刊繼續了該學派在一般分析領域的傳統。埃里溫的一群非常多產的數學家在以下領域為這本領先的數學雜志做出了貢獻:實分析和復分析;近似;邊值問題;積分與隨機幾何;微分方程;概率;積分方程;代數。同行評審《當代數學分析雜志》是一份同行評議的期刊。我們使用單一的盲同行評審格式。我們的評審團隊包括來自50多個國家的50多位專家。2018年從提交到首次評審的平均周期為90天，從首次評審到驗收的平均周期為40天。2018年投稿退稿率為75%。接受發表文章的最終決定由同行評審人員和編輯委員會做出。被邀請的審稿人因利益沖突，認為不符合審稿條件或者不能審稿的，應當及時通知審稿人，并予以拒絕。審稿人應以一種合理合理的方式清晰地闡述自己的觀點，這樣作者才能利用審稿人的觀點來完善稿件。必須避免對作者的個人批評。評論者應該顯示發表的一篇評論(我)任何相關的工作沒有被引用的作者,(2)任何已報道在以前的出版物和沒有適當的參考或引用,(2)任何實質性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發表或未發表)的個人知識。

Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis (Armenian Academy of Sciences) is an outlet for research stemming from the widely acclaimed Armenian school of theory of functions, this journal today continues the traditions of that school in the area of general analysis. A very prolific group of mathematicians in Yerevan contribute to this leading mathematics journal in the following fields: real and complex analysis; approximations; boundary value problems; integral and stochastic geometry; differential equations; probability; integral equations; algebra.PEER REVIEWJournal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 50 experts from 50 countries. The average period from submission to first decision in 2018 was 90 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 40 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2018 was 75%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Peer Reviewers and the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.